Just write a reply to these two posts. Write in your own words. One paragraph for each post. Please differentiate which reply is which. 150 words minimum per reply. This is like a conversation. The first file is my discussion. And the second file is the reply post.
Though this article does not focus solely on the Activism of Mexican Immigrants/Mexican Americans, it does question whether 1960s activism in general was good for the country. As in previous other PRO/CON articles, there are 2 sides to this argument. How does each Historian support their argument. What is the evidence, if any, used by that historian.
Please read the full pdf
After learning about the Italian Renaissance in this week’s lecture (Chapter 11 lecture), answer the following question. Follow the directions carefully in order to receive full credit.
Chapter 11 Lecture Question:
In this week’s lecture, you learned about the Italian Renaissance- how it began, how it spread, and what it produced. Considering this, which group of people do you think played the most important role in the establishment and spread of the Renaissance- patrons or artists/scholars?
Directions for Answering the Question:
Three pages along with reference list, minimum two
2. Fighting for the Right to Fight: African American Experiences in World War II
THEN:
Identify the thesis/argument- what is the big “take-away” that the historians and museum experts want people to walk away with?
Note which types of primary sources are used in the exhibit or presentation (images, uniforms, newspapers, specific objects, etc).
Evaluate the connection between primary sources/objects and take-way; Is it clear why the primary sources/objects were chosen? Do they clearly relate to each other and the take-away idea?
Imagine you are eavesdropping as people leave the exhibit/presentation: what do you you might here them saying about what they just learned?
Questions to answer after watching and learning about the video you chose:
1. Identify the thesis/argument- what is the big “take-away” that the historians and museum experts want people to walk away with?
2. Note which types of primary sources are used in the exhibit or presentation (images, uniforms, newspapers, specific objects, etc).
3. Evaluate the connection between primary sources/objects and take-way; Is it clear why the primary sources/objects were chosen? Do they clearly relate to each other and the take-away idea?
4. Imagine you are eavesdropping as people leave the exhibit/presentation: what do you you might here them saying about what they just learned?
250-500words max
When citing since it’s a video you can use the Youtube channel name
Also, I need this to be answered in a way the questions are. For example, you do the 1st question, and you answer it, then move to 2nd and answer it and so on.
Read the Primary Reading Source Document #3. Answer Questions 1 and 2 in at least two short paragraphs.
Please see the attached
