Human subjects research protection
Human subjects research protection
ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW
NRSE 4550 RUBRIC: MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT 6: WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT – HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION (30 pts) Criteria Accomplished Proficient Poor Not Acceptable 2 Peer-Reviewed References are provided in correct APA format 5 to 5 Points 3 to 4 Points 1 to 2 Points 0 to 0 Points References are correctly referenced in proper APA 6th ed. format 2 references provided; References have less than 2 APA errors Only 1 reference is provided or references have 2-3 APA errors Reference is NOT in APA format or has more than 3 errors Essential elements of informed consent are discussed 5 to 5 Points 3 to 4 Points 1 to 2 Points 0 to 2 Points 3 or more key elements of informed consent are discussed. Most key elements of informed consent are discussed, but one key element is missing. Less than 3 key elements are discussed Key elements of informed consent not addressed. Special vulnerable populations in research are identified and discussed 7 to 8 Points 5 to 6 Points 3 to 4 Points 0 to 2 Points Correctly identifies the type of studies and provides an appropriate explanation Correctly identifies 3 or more vulnerable research populations, but discussion is lacking. Correctly identifies 3 or more vulnerable research populations, but does not fully discuss; Identifies only 2 vulnerable research populations. Correctly identifies 1 or fewer vulnerable research populations; fails to discuss vulnerable populations in research Discusses the role of the nurse in advocating for the patient in research situations 7 to 7 Points 4 to 6 Points 2 to 4 Points 0 to 1 Points Provides a full, in-depth discussion of the role of the nurse in advocating for the patient in research Provides an adequate discussion of the role of the nurse in advocating for the patient in research, but is somewhat lacking. Provides a superficial discussion of the role of the nurse in advocating for the patient in research Provides no discussion or lacks a logical discussion of the role of the nurse in advocating for the patient in research. Discussion is well-written and free of grammatical and mechanical errors 5 to 5 Points 3 to 4 Points 1 to 2 Points 0 to 0 Points Provides a well-written discussion, free of grammatical and mechanical areas. Provides a mostly well-written discussion with fewer than 3 grammatical and mechanical errors. Provides a fair or poor discussion with 3-4 grammatical and mechanical errors. Discussion is poorly written; illogical; difficult or impossible to read; Includes 5 or more grammatical or mechanical errors (Does not include APA) Last updated: 10/09/2018 © 2018 School of Nursing Ohio University Page 1 of 1
Purchase answer to see full attachment
