Dersign a pilot program 4-6 pages

/in /by

Dersign a pilot program 4-6 pages

Description

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

 

 

For this Assignment, in 4-6 pages design a pilot program and evaluation to address community needs for your Final Project initiative proposal. In your Assignment, be sure to include the following items:

  • Description of your proposed program that you developed in Weeks 3 and 6
  • Description of your proposed pilot program
    • Describe a small scale program that will help to determine the feasibility of your final project
    • Describe how many participants, staff, volunteers, and organizations will be involved
  • Description of your proposed evaluation of the pilot program including a tool (Six Sigma, TQM, etc…) to improve the proposed piloted processes
    • You may also develop a survey, use focus groups, or interviews for the evaluation process
  • Description of what other health care organizations and/or nongovernmental organizations have done to address your initiative

Grading RUBRIC

EXCELLENT – above expectations GOOD – met expectations FAIR – below expectations POOR – significantly below expectations or missing
Proposed Program and Pilot Study
Explain proposed program and pilot study for project initiative		 Points:

Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

The paper shows depth in critical thinking when addressing the proposed program and pilot study for the project initiative.

Feedback:

 Points:

Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

The paper fully addresses the proposed program and pilot study for the project initiative.

Feedback:

 Points:

Points Range: 17 (17%) – 19 (19%)

The paper lacks depth or clarity related to the proposed program and pilot study for the project initiative.

Feedback:

 Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 16 (16%)

The paper does not address the proposed program and pilot study for the project initiative, is inaccurate, missing, or is of poor quality.

Feedback:
Proposed Evaluation of Pilot Study
Explain the evaluation process of a proposed pilot study and the relevance of an evaluation tool to improve upon the proposed piloted processes		 Points:

Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

The paper shows critical thinking and problem solving in its explanation of the evaluation process of a proposed pilot study and of the relevance of an evaluation tool to improve the proposed piloted processes.

Feedback:

 Points:

Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

The paper fully addresses the evaluation process of a proposed pilot study and the relevance of an evaluation tool to improve the proposed piloted processes.

Feedback:

 Points:

Points Range: 17 (17%) – 19 (19%)

The paper lacks depth or clarity related to the evaluation process of a proposed pilot study and the relevance of an evaluation tool to improve proposed piloted processes.

Feedback:

 Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 16 (16%)

The paper does not address the evaluation process of a proposed pilot study and the relevance of an evaluation tool to improve proposed piloted processes, is inaccurate, missing, or is of poor quality.

Feedback:
Healthcare Organization and/or NGO Involvement
Explain how other health care organizations or NGOs implemented the proposed pilot project initiative		 Points:

Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

The paper shows critical thinking and problem solving in its explanation of how other health care organizations or NGOs have implemented the proposed pilot project initiative.

Feedback:

 Points:

Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

The paper fully addresses how other health care organizations or NGOs have implemented the proposed pilot project initiative.

Feedback:

 Points:

Points Range: 17 (17%) – 19 (19%)

The paper lacks depth or clarity related to how health care organizations or NGOs have implemented the proposed pilot project initiative.

Feedback:

 Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 16 (16%)

The paper does not address how health care organizations or NGOs have implemented the proposed pilot project initiative, is inaccurate, missing, or is of poor quality.

Feedback:
Writing Points:

Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

Paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, contains original writing and proper paraphrasing, follows APA style, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate level writing style.

Feedback:

 Points:

Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

Paper is mostly consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors.

Feedback:

 Points:

Points Range: 17 (17%) – 19 (19%)

Paper is somewhat consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors.

Feedback:

 Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 16 (16%)

Paper is well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or shows heavy reliance on quoting.